| RemoveRowdy http://removerowdy.com/forum/ |
|
| Da Bears n Da Boys http://removerowdy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4615 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 11:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Da Bears n Da Boys |
crush... kill... destroy... |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
It's gonna be a looooooooooong day for Cutler. Fucking douche. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Jason Garret: Drive killer. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
DEZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!@!!!! |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
What the hell was that kick all about? Tell me that wasn't Wade trying to make a call to prove he's in charge. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Wasn't a fumble. The ball wasn't "moving" before he went down, Troy. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 12:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Polacks rule! |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Whoever called for the challenge should immediately be canned. What did they see that would make them question the call? Obvious touchdown. Way to waste a time out. |
|
| Author: | Stu [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
4 wins |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 1:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
|
|
|
| Author: | Stu [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
What is so great about this defense? |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Challenger commercial = funneh. Anytime you make fun of the British it's a plus. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Alright Dez! |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Everyware was basically dragged down by his jersey but of course the refs don't see that. 
|
|
| Author: | Stu [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
3 wins |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
I don't blame Beuler, not one bit. He's not a field goal kicker, plain and simple. This falls completely on the coaching staff and specifically, Wade. |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Sweet Greggo wrote: I don't blame Beuler, not one bit. He's not a field goal kicker, plain and simple. This falls completely on the coaching staff and specifically, Wade. He was a Jerry decision wasn't he? |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
0-2. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Trained Goucho wrote: Sweet Greggo wrote: I don't blame Beuler, not one bit. He's not a field goal kicker, plain and simple. This falls completely on the coaching staff and specifically, Wade. He was a Jerry decision wasn't he? Ya, and he's got final say. I have to think though that the head coach should be able to go to the GM/Owner and tell him flatly "HE'S NOT A FG KICKER" and the GM should listen. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Trained Goucho wrote: 0-2.
|
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
What a bullshit organization. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Trained Goucho wrote: What a bullshit organization. How about how they didn't even have anyone to challenge Beuhler in the preseason? You go soft on an unproven kicker? |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Oh, Jeez. Game = over. This thing is fucked up from top to bottom. Top tier talent (on paper) + incompetent coaching = fucking disaster. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Witten is upset about not going back in, but it's the right call. Jerry will probably fire whoever is keeping him out, but good on the medical staff for making the call. |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Starting the 2 min offense, 10 points down, with a 4 yard pass. |
|
| Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
I can't even get worked up. No head coach = this. |
|
| Author: | jim jack [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Wow this team sucks. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
When is this band of idiots going to figure out FG kickers matter? Do we not go through this bullsh just about every year? And when we have a good kicker in, games are won and stories are told of how important he is. It's the only skill position that isn't treated as a skill position. |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Wade will find it harder and harder to stick to his diet as the year progresses. |
|
| Author: | Stu [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
The kicker is number 28 on the list of problems with this team. |
|
| Author: | bigboy [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
rowdyhatinwalt wrote: I can't even get worked up. Switched to the Nascar race at halftime whilst waiting for the Ranger game to start.
|
|
| Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Stu wrote: The kicker is number 28 on the list of problems with this team.
|
|
| Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
the backfield = not that great. Marion simply doesn't have the same explosive power. Choice isn't even used much. Felix is used in places you'd probably use Choice. Why isn't Felix used more of a chance up, instead of running him up the middle or off guard or tackle? Receivers = not that great. (how many bobbles that wind up as interceptions should you 'allow' per game?) Romo = again, having one of those 'he's just kinda off' games. How many of those does your star QB get? Secondary = spotty. Jenkins is sometimes good, sometimes he or someone gets burned bigtime. Kicker? Yeh, he sucks. But give me smarter offensive play where you rely less on field goals (long range, at that) and I'm not as concerned. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 6:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
I'm not going to argue that the kicker is the most important player on the team, but it IS a skill position and shouldn't be an afterthought. I don't think most teams can realistically figure on blowing everyone out by a couple of TDs every week. They can find a new kicker while they're blowing the fucking thing up. Good god this team sucks. |
|
| Author: | cap [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
rowdyhatinwalt wrote: Receivers = not that great. (how many bobbles that wind up as interceptions should you 'allow' per game?) . 
|
|
| Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Sun Sep 19, 2010 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
cap wrote: rowdyhatinwalt wrote: Receivers = not that great. (how many bobbles that wind up as interceptions should you 'allow' per game?) . what the fuck are you not sure about? |
|
| Author: | jim jack [ Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Nothing brings out the derp in the DFW area like the Cowboys losing two in a row. Much of it comes from the hosts, but the callers ran them a close race today. Winning a game every once in awhile would spare me of this sort of torture. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Another week, another segment filled with Norm apologizing for Garret. Is Norm his secret adopted father or something? Is it not conceivable that the guy just can't call a game? |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
They're playing a pretty nice selection of music on 91.7. A little funk and a little jazz. Soothing. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
Trained Goucho wrote: They're playing a pretty nice selection of music on 91.7. A little funk and a little jazz. Soothing. My wife loves that station but every time I listen it's Mexican Music Thursday or something. |
|
| Author: | Trained Goucho [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
I hate that and the overly Irish chick that plays Celtic music on Saturday. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Tue Sep 21, 2010 10:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Da Bears n Da Boys |
I did turn the clock radio beside the bed to it and one morning they played Apeman by the Kinks, which was a nice way to wake up. Especially considering the first thing I do each morning is scratch my balls and fart. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|