I wish Mike Hunt would share his thoughts about this season.

The jury was way too bitter. Dan deserved to win. Who cares who wins competitions? Those are a bunch of silly carnival games. Dan owned every decision in the house. Shane acted like he just lost his puppy dog.

I can't be too mad that Ian won cuz he's a good kid and I think that's why the jury voted for him but once again, the strongest/best player got screwed cuz the jury remains so bitter that they got outplayed/stabbed in the back that they refuse to give it to them and they use the "you lied to my face and went back on your word and anyone who can do that is a bad person" justification. When will these sheds realize that in BB or Survivor or whatever gay reality show that once you enter the game there are no moral codes that everyone is supposed to abide by. Outwit, outplay, outlast. That's it. Sure you can play the game and win by being Mr. Nice Guy but that's just one playing style. There are countless ways to get to the end and I'm tired of jury members bringing morals into their decision.

He swore on the bible and going to hell

Who cares? It means nothing. I bet Dan is much more Christian than you are outside of the BB house.

Did anyone catch the debut of "Big Tips Texas" last night? I unfortunately did.

I humbly stand before you all, hat in hand, anguished and needing advise. I will understand that if you shun me and this post. I deserve it based on 10+ years of mostly mean-spirited, acerbic posts. To all, I apologize. I'm not, nor never was, the psychotic as I came across.

To my dismay, I learned recently my son is dating Amber, the vulgar bartender, from said show and while he "cares for her", she is crazy about him. He was with her last night at RNH for a watching party and I hope his eyes were opened. The cast of BBT jokingly said to her that she'll be lucky if he didn't drop her after viewing the first episode. My son is graduating from UNT in December and will going to UT Law School in the fall. Law schools look at all aspects of a candidate's life. Fearful that guilt by association could cost him.

He claims that she is nothing like she appears on the show. She is thoughtful, intelligent and deep; but the tongue stud, five tats and slutty persona says otherwise. From the neck down, I understand the attraction.

If you were in my shoes, what would do?

Sincerely,
Mallard

Great body, ugly helmet. Note to self to schedule opthomologist appointment.

Much like the proverbial train wreck, I watched the trash again. Terd, you are correct-- I get the nookie part of it, but nothing else. Diello, you're also correct--he cannot be associated with this tramp or his prospects of law school are down the tubes. By contract with MTV, she can't dilvulge anything about her personal life, but she posted on his as I mentioned before. He deleted it, she became upset and he told her that he can't be overtly associated with her. MTV has even asked him to be a part of Season 2--he wisely declined. I'm hoping with each episode that he sees what he is mixed up with. He claims that she is intellegent, caring and nothing like she portrays on the show. Nobody is that great of an actress. God, I hope this fizzles out quick. Thanks guys--I respect your opinions.

As if anyone gives a good goddamn, the law school quandary is over. After visiting UT, Baylor, SMU, UH, A&M and Texas Tech--the winner is TT. He was there on an invite last weekend and they wooed him.

Any of you fuckers have any advice on/history with Lubbock? Liquor, brothels, etc.

As if anyone gives a good goddamn, the law school quandary is over. After visiting UT, Baylor, SMU, UH, A&M and Texas Tech--the winner is TT. He was there on an invite last weekend and they wooed him.

Any of you fuckers have any advice on/history with Lubbock? Liquor, brothels, etc.