RemoveRowdy http://removerowdy.com/forum/ |
|
Let's go Raiders http://removerowdy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=25 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Tue Sep 30, 2008 10:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Davis said that Kiffin objected to drafting quarterback JaMarcus Russell... That's reason enough to give him another head coaching job. He at least can evaluate talent. |
Author: | Sagger Pance [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
no shit. He's probably the worst pick in the top ten of that draft. Oh wait the Dolphins picked that spare kick returner didn't they. |
Author: | rowdyhatinwalt [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 5:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Sagger Pance wrote: no shit. He's probably the worst pick in the top ten of that draft. Oh wait the Dolphins picked that spare kick returner didn't they. Ted Ginn? |
Author: | fruitdog [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
ed gein |
Author: | or somesuch [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Kiffin wanted Brady Quinn as the #1 pick. |
Author: | Sagger Pance [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
where'd you see that? |
Author: | Diello [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 6:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
fruitdog wrote: ed gein So I debated about this one. Do I go with: Hey that guy's got heart! And he keeps it in a jar in the fridge! Or simply: That guy's got skins. |
Author: | or somesuch [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Sagger Pance wrote: where'd you see that? A message board that I read, posted by Raiders fans. I googled it and Al Davis said he wanted Quinn or CJ. CJ would have been a fine selection, if they had a QB and line in place. |
Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Oct 02, 2008 7:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
or somesuch wrote: Sagger Pance wrote: where'd you see that? NFL message board, by Raiders fans. I googled it and Al Davis said he wanted Quinn or CJ. CJ would have been a fine selection, if they had a QB and line in place. HSC could use your help. |
Author: | fruitdog [ Fri Oct 03, 2008 10:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Diello wrote: fruitdog wrote: ed gein That guy's got skins. this makes me smilemouf. |
Author: | Sagger Pance [ Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
or somesuch wrote: Sagger Pance wrote: where'd you see that? A message board that I read, posted by Raiders fans. I googled it and Al Davis said he wanted Quinn or CJ. CJ would have been a fine selection, if they had a QB and line in place. I still find that hard to believe. Maybe I'm giving Kiffin too much credit. |
Author: | cap [ Fri Oct 03, 2008 3:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Sapp comments may support Kiffin's claim Davis tampered with defense |
Author: | or somesuch [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
More of Goodell out to get the Raiders. Raiders | Team faces fine, possible loss of draft picks Thu, 9 Oct 2008 23:06:19 -0700 Updating a previous item, Karen Guregian, of the Boston Herald, reports the Oakland Raiders could face $250,000 in fines or lose multiple draft picks, according to ESPN's Chris Mortensen. Owner Al Davis has received a letter from the NFL informing him that the team is subject to discipline for publicly accusing the New England Patriots of tampering with WR Randy Moss. |
Author: | cap [ Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
what a bunch of horse shit! I never outright said they tampered, he hinted it. Big difference. And yes, this is another example of the NFL fucking with the Raiders. |
Author: | or somesuch [ Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Those wacky Raiders! Raiders notes Team celebrates TDs ... in practice By Jason Jones jejones@sacbee.com Published: Friday, Oct. 31, 2008 | Page 7C ALAMEDA – The Raiders have been celebrating touchdowns more lately. Don't be puzzled if you haven't seen the revelry. The Raiders are emphasizing getting into the end zone and practicing doing something they haven't done a lot of – celebrating the score – during practice. The Raiders have scored the fewest touchdowns in the NFL – nine. It's the latest ploy by interim coach Tom Cable to coax some good vibes out of an offense that has been field-goal happy most of the season as the Raiders prepare to host the Atlanta Falcons on Sunday. "Now we do a thing in practice, where guys run to the end zone," quarterback JaMarcus Russell said. "Or we make it in the end zone, as far as the offense, (we) congratulate those guys, get used to doing it. The more you get used to it, the more you'll be better with it on the field, as a team." Cable is especially concerned that the Raiders have one touchdown in the first half this season. He said he has examined each first-half possession, looking for ways to spark the offense early. After Sunday's loss in Baltimore, Cable said scoring a touchdown in the first half would help the morale of the team that hasn't been able to jump on opponents despite good field position. "I think it's more planning how you want to do it early in the game," Cable said. "Hopefully we'll have a little more success with it this week." The Raiders might look to be more aggressive early, throwing the ball more instead of relying heavily on the run. The lone first-half touchdown was a rare big play – a 63-yard touchdown pass to tight end Zach Miller. But mainly, it has been field goals for the Raiders. "You want to go down and score," wide receiver Javon Walker said. "Set the tone, to help our defense play what they need to play and do the things that they need to do with the lead. … We haven't been scoring a lot of touchdowns lately but, when it comes, it's just going to keep on rolling." |
Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
kinda like congratulating the special olympic kids for crossing the finish line, even though they ran around the track backwards. |
Author: | cap [ Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
it ain't working |
Author: | or somesuch [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
What a trainwreck |
Author: | jim jack [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
or somesuch wrote: Just finished reading that myself. So he beat the crap out of him because he was a snitch for Al Davis? Dang. |
Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 11:19 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
that's messed up. |
Author: | cap [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Raiders beat KC by 10....Cowboys had to go to OT....look out thanksgiviing! |
Author: | jim jack [ Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
You should go to that game, Cap. |
Author: | fruitdog [ Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Author: | cap [ Mon Oct 12, 2009 4:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
^real football man^ |
Author: | jim jack [ Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
Wonder what's in the drink that's on the table there? |
Author: | vbear [ Tue Oct 13, 2009 9:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
cap wrote: ^real football man^ i'm not sure if that is a real human
|
Author: | cap [ Sat Aug 10, 2019 10:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Let's go Raiders |
cap wrote:
|
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |