Sweet Greggo wrote:
Trout is probably still wondering wtf happened
That twitch his right leg has when he realizes that ball is travelling slower than highway speed cracks me up.
| RemoveRowdy http://removerowdy.com/forum/ |
|
| Rangers 2013 http://removerowdy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=4888 |
Page 4 of 11 |
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:22 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Looks like a curveball. A lot of guys throw those. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
You're right. Nothing special here, let's move along. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
It could also be a splitter. |
|
| Author: | cap [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Tit Whistle wrote: It could also be a splitter. But is she a spitter?
|
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
How can she split? |
|
| Author: | or somesuch [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 8:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Sweet Greggo wrote: You're right. Nothing special here, let's move along. I still like you, Yu. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Sweet Greggo wrote: Trout is probably still wondering wtf happened That twitch his right leg has when he realizes that ball is travelling slower than highway speed cracks me up. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Ok fine! You're a real fan. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Tit Whistle wrote: Ok fine! You're a real fan. omg I feel like Pinocchio! Which means you must be the Blue Fairy! |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Another compilation 
|
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
What exactly are those supposed to be showing us? That he threw a bunch of pitches to a guy? Sure, it looks cool, but if you wanna show something we can actually comprehend, maybe show a pitch-by-pitch so we can see how he worked the count and then fooled the batter with the final pitch. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
I don't think this was all the pitches at an at bat. It's a compilation of the different types of pitches he threw over the course of the game. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Ok then, that's acceptable. But watch your ass! *stands threateningly with hands on hips* *realizes it's not working* *runs away* |
|
| Author: | Diello [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
The point is that he can throw all of those pitches with the exact same motion and release point. When you can throw 95 and 75 with the same motion and release point, you are good. |
|
| Author: | Diello [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
fruitdog wrote:  Like fruit posted weeks ago. |
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Diello wrote: The point is that he can throw all of those pitches with the exact same motion and release point. When you can throw 95 and 75 with the same motion and release point, you are good. Thank you. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
What Django said, plus the fact that the path of most of the balls are practically the same until the last second. The batter has to choose to swing before the ball breaks, and based on the path of the ball he has no idea which way it will actually break. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Here's what the guy that made it says: "An experiment in showing a variety of pitch types in a unique way. Used 5 pitches from last night; a 97 mph 4 seam fastball, 96 mph 2 seam fastball, 85 mph slider, 78 mph slider with a different grip that is more vertical, and a 64 mph slow curve. He also throws a cutter and splitter/changeup regularly but I figured those would make it too messy. I tried to use pitches that started in a similar location and had the movement take them away rather than say an inside fastball and outside slider, though you can tell that wasn't exact." |
|
| Author: | fruitdog [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 1:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
|
|
| Author: | cap [ Thu Apr 25, 2013 4:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
fruitdog wrote: Awesome pic Fruit!! |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Wed May 01, 2013 9:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
|
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Wed May 01, 2013 12:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
|
|
| Author: | cap [ Wed May 01, 2013 12:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
He was saluting the ump, cuz that dude was safe/. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Wed May 01, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
That's what I thought too, but they stopped showing the replay before I could make sure |
|
| Author: | cap [ Wed May 01, 2013 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Sweet Greggo wrote: That's what I thought too, but they stopped showing the replay before I could make sure TAG didn't even question it once |
|
| Author: | or somesuch [ Wed May 01, 2013 3:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
cap wrote: Sweet Greggo wrote: That's what I thought too, but they stopped showing the replay before I could make sure TAG didn't even question it once because the Rangers got away with it. |
|
| Author: | jim jack [ Sat May 04, 2013 10:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Suck it, Red Sox Nation. |
|
| Author: | cap [ Sun May 05, 2013 7:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
jim jack wrote: Suck it, Red Sox Nation. 
|
|
| Author: | fruitdog [ Mon May 06, 2013 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
jim jack wrote: Suck it, Red Sox Nation. I went Fridee and the sawks fans had maybe one chance to stand up and cheer. It was early on in the game for some meaningless play. It was a nice feeling knowing there were a bunch of douches sitting in the stands and sitting on their hands. |
|
| Author: | bigboy [ Mon May 06, 2013 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
I went Saturday and the Sox fans were pretty quiet. I was far more annoyed at the Ranger "fan" behind me that spent a good half inning debating with his buddy about whether or not J.D. Drew was playing shortstop for Boston (it was Stephen Drew) and an entire Kinsler at bat telling his wife how terrible he is because "he always takes the first strike". |
|
| Author: | fruitdog [ Mon May 06, 2013 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
 we need more guys like Josh that swing away at everything,
|
|
| Author: | Tit Whistle [ Mon May 06, 2013 2:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
That's why Rangers fans shouldn't be allowed to go to watch baseball. |
|
| Author: | bigboy [ Mon May 06, 2013 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
| All those fuckheads want is roundtrip waves, more kiss cam screen time, and betting on the dot race. Let em have it.
|
|
| Author: | cap [ Mon May 06, 2013 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
fruitdog wrote: :babyarm: we need more guys like Josh that swing away at everything, AJ |
|
| Author: | cap [ Mon May 06, 2013 3:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
fruitdog wrote: :babyarm: we need more guys like Josh that swing away at everything, AJ |
|
| Author: | or somesuch [ Mon May 06, 2013 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
cap wrote: fruitdog wrote: :babyarm: we need more guys like Josh that swing away at everything, AJ Learn math and get back to us, sparky. |
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Wed May 08, 2013 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
AJ2DL :/ |
|
| Author: | cap [ Thu May 09, 2013 8:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Told ya |
|
| Author: | or somesuch [ Thu May 09, 2013 8:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
You didn't tell us shit, idiot. You're just trying to get a rise out of me or fruitdog and goddamnit, it worked. |
|
| Author: | jim jack [ Thu May 09, 2013 9:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
|
|
| Author: | Sweet Greggo [ Wed May 15, 2013 7:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Nut check 
|
|
| Author: | jim jack [ Wed May 15, 2013 7:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Rangers 2013 |
Sweet Greggo wrote: Nut check LOL. |
|
| Page 4 of 11 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|