RemoveRowdy
http://removerowdy.com/forum/

Oscars
http://removerowdy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4701
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Oscars

Kirk Douglas = GEN. IUS.

Author:  jim jack [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

He ain't dead?

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

He's damn near.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 9:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

He probably is by now.

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

He was still more coherent than Melissa Leo.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I'm still about a half hour behind so I'm hoping I'll know what you're talking about soon.

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

She's the chick who won supporting actress. He presented the award to her.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:24 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Tit Whistle wrote:
She's the chick who won supporting actress. He presented the award to her.

Ah. I didn't understand a damn word he said so I must have missed it :D I didn't see the Fighter but I'm sure she did a fine job. I was hoping the kid from True Grit was going to win, she did an awesome job.

Author:  Trained Goucho [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Seeing him reduced to acting like a cutesy old clown was hard to watch. Cantankerous and bitter is the way a stroked out 90 something should be.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

That auto-tuned bit was the Gregory Brothers... I'd recognize their work anywhere.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

So who else thought that we were gonna have an "Oprah moment" just now?

"Everyone look under your chairs!" "YOU'RE getting and Oscar!" "YOU'RE getting an Oscar!" "YOU'RE getting an Oscar!"

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I like how she seemed to want to share the spotlight with the winners.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I didn't know Jude Law was so short :/ Isn't Robert Downy Jr only like 5' 7" (my height)

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Yay! Florence + the Machine!

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 10:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

:urgh: ack! Sleastack!

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Tom Hooper? Bogus.

Author:  bigboy [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Hooper starring Burt Reynolds = the real deal

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I'm startin to think True Grit is gonna get shut out :mad: 2 awards left and I think it should get em both. Of course, it's the only movie I've seen that's been nominated, but still...

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

The King's Speech is running the rest of the night.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Someone needs to tell Portman they didn't cut off the dude that won the Oscar for Asst Taint Wiper just so she could ramble on like a fuckin loony bitch. stfu and go already.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Wtf that dude married nanny mcfee and now he's winning oscars??? boo!

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I hope The King's Speech isn't as boring as this dude.

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Haven't seen The King's Speech, but from what I hear, it ranks up there with Driving Miss Daisy and A Beautiful Mind. Of course, I'll be the final judge of that when the time comes.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Those little shits are lip syncing! Hollywood is so fake!

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Shit, half of them had fake tits.

Author:  Diello [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 12:00 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Shit, the Oscars were tonight?

Author:  or somesuch [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 8:55 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Tit Whistle wrote:
from what I hear, it ranks up there with Driving Miss Daisy and A Beautiful Mind.


What does this mean?

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

or somesuch wrote:
Tit Whistle wrote:
from what I hear, it ranks up there with Driving Miss Daisy and A Beautiful Mind.


What does this mean?

It means it's a middle of the road questionable pick that everyone will shake their heads at in a few years. I'm going by what the internet tells me, that's all.

Author:  or somesuch [ Mon Feb 28, 2011 9:32 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

That's what I thought it meant, but I thought a Beautiful Mind was a pretty good choice. Blackhawk Down and Mulholland Drive were better, but I didn't think it was a travesty or anything.

Author:  fruitdog [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 6:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

I haven't seen The King's Speech but I found this interesting-

http://screencrave.com/2011-03-01/why-t ... rrelevant/

"Sure, The King’s Speech is good, but it’s the art cinema equivalent of a hamburger. It pushes zero boundaries, and doesn’t really demand much of its audience. It’s got no deeper insights. A year from now, it’ll be 'Oh, yeah, that movie. It was good. I liked it.' It’s just another period piece aimed squarely at your mom, the very definition of Oscar bait... It’s kind of offensive that a movie like The King’s Speech won in a year that saw movies like Black Swan and True Grit not only come out, but thrive, and have no chance of winning because Harvey Weinstein is a master of gaming the Oscar system."

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

fruitdog wrote:
I haven't seen The King's Speech but I found this interesting-

http://screencrave.com/2011-03-01/why-t ... rrelevant/

"Sure, The King’s Speech is good, but it’s the art cinema equivalent of a hamburger. It pushes zero boundaries, and doesn’t really demand much of its audience. It’s got no deeper insights. A year from now, it’ll be 'Oh, yeah, that movie. It was good. I liked it.' It’s just another period piece aimed squarely at your mom, the very definition of Oscar bait... It’s kind of offensive that a movie like The King’s Speech won in a year that saw movies like Black Swan and True Grit not only come out, but thrive, and have no chance of winning because Harvey Weinstein is a master of gaming the Oscar system."

I haven't seen it either but I've read a lot of that sentiment online. A lot of people at least thought David Fincher would've won Best Director, but that other no name did instead, mainly because Harvey Weinstein had him out schmoozing while Fincher was in Sweden making his next film.

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

All I gotta say is King's Speech must be one helluva movie to beat out True Grit. TG is an instant classic.

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Inception was better.

Author:  fruitdog [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 11:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

http://inception.davepedu.com/

Author:  Tit Whistle [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 12:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Whoa

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

Tit Whistle wrote:
Inception was better.


:notsure:

Author:  Sweet Greggo [ Thu Mar 03, 2011 1:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Oscars

fruitdog wrote:
http://inception.davepedu.com/

I need to install that on my truck and scare them dumb bitches putting on their makeup at stoplights.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/